Close

Commercial

Ten Close KPIs selected to drive sales rep performance across the full funnel, from activity to closed revenue, with the selection criteria made explicit.

10 available indicators

Indicator Object Type Formula Unit
Deals Won Number of opportunities closed as won. Opportunities Lagging COUNT count
Revenue Closed Total value of opportunities closed as won. Opportunities Lagging SUM(value)
Win Rate Ratio of won opportunities over total opportunities. Opportunities Lagging COUNT_RATIO %
Deals in Pipeline Number of active opportunities currently in the pipeline. Opportunities Leading COUNT count
Pipeline Value Total value of active opportunities in the pipeline. Opportunities Leading SUM(value)
Average Deal Cycle Average number of days from opportunity creation to close. Opportunities Lagging AVG(days_to_close) days
Calls Made Number of outbound call activities logged by the rep. Activities Leading COUNT count
Emails Sent Number of outbound emails sent by the rep. Activities Leading COUNT count
Tasks Completed Number of tasks marked as complete by the rep. Tasks Leading COUNT count
New Leads Created Number of new leads created by the rep. Leads Leading COUNT count

Close exposes multiple object types: opportunities, leads, tasks, and activities — the latter encompassing calls, emails, and SMS. This integration covers all four object types because each supports a distinct layer of sales rep performance: opportunities capture commercial outcomes, activities capture the effort generating those outcomes, tasks capture follow-through discipline, and leads capture pipeline generation. Ten KPIs were retained, selected against three criteria: ability to attribute to an owner, resistance to gaming, and balance between leading and lagging indicators.

Commercial outcomes: reading opportunities through volume, value, and efficiency

Six KPIs derive from opportunities. They cover the complete arc of a deal: what is won, what it is worth, how efficiently the rep converts, and what is in progress.

Results and portfolio shape

Deals Won counts the number of opportunities closed as won. Revenue Closed sums the total value of those opportunities. Reading them together reveals the shape of a rep's commercial activity: two reps with identical Deals Won counts but divergent Revenue Closed figures are executing fundamentally different strategies. One operates with small, high-frequency deals; the other with larger, lower-frequency ones. Neither is inherently superior, but confusing the two by looking only at deal count produces systematically wrong comparative conclusions.

Conversion efficiency and cycle length

Win Rate measures the fraction of opportunities that result in a closed deal. Average Deal Cycle measures the average number of days from opportunity creation to close. These two indicators are in structural tension. A high Win Rate combined with a long Average Deal Cycle suggests that the rep qualifies aggressively but processes a restricted volume. A low Win Rate with a short cycle suggests the opposite: broad prospecting with limited conversion. Neither pattern is self-evidently problematic — the right profile depends on the commercial strategy — but tracking one without the other makes it impossible to distinguish deliberate positioning from drift.

Pipeline health as a leading indicator

Deals in Pipeline and Pipeline Value are the two leading indicators in the opportunity block. They anticipate future commercial output where the preceding four indicators confirm past output. The combination of both is necessary: a high Deals in Pipeline count with a low Pipeline Value signals a pipeline of small or low-confidence opportunities, which the lagging indicators will confirm in subsequent periods. Pipeline Value alone, on the other hand, can be inflated by a small number of poorly qualified large deals. Neither indicator is reliable in isolation; together they express both the volume and the weight of active work.

Activity: the effort layer that leads converts do not capture

Calls Made counts the number of call activities logged by each rep. Emails Sent counts outbound emails. These two indicators measure the input side of the sales process. A rep with strong outcome indicators but low activity may be operating on a maturing portfolio with limited pipeline generation; a rep with high activity but weak outcomes may be prospecting ineffectively or working on poorly qualified accounts. Neither conclusion is reachable from outcome indicators alone. Activity indicators do carry a logging risk: calls or emails that are not entered in Close are invisible to this integration, which makes their accuracy a direct function of rep usage discipline.

Tasks and leads: follow-through discipline and pipeline generation

Tasks Completed measures the volume of tasks a rep marks complete within a period. New Leads Created counts the number of new lead records created by the rep. These two indicators address dimensions of commercial work that the opportunity block cannot see. Task completion reflects whether a rep acts on scheduled follow-ups — a discipline that is weakly correlated with outcome metrics in the short term but strongly correlated over longer horizons. New Leads Created captures the top-of-funnel generation effort, which becomes visible in the opportunity pipeline with a delay of several weeks. Reading New Leads Created today anticipates Deals in Pipeline in the next period; the chain connecting these two indicators is the mechanism by which prospecting effort becomes commercial pipeline.

Scope and limits of the integration

Close records structured sales activity at a level of granularity that few CRMs match. What it does not record is the quality of those activities: a call that advances a deal and a call that fails to reach the prospect are both counted as one activity. Emails Sent measures volume, not effectiveness. Win Rate captures the ratio of conversions but not the reasons for loss, which are entered inconsistently across teams and rarely support statistical analysis.

More structurally, all KPIs in this integration depend on complete and disciplined data entry in Close. A rep who calls without logging, who manages relationships outside the tool, or who creates opportunities late will produce systematically undervalued indicators. The integration measures what Close records; it cannot correct for what it does not.