Knowledge Base

← Corporates and Non-Financial Actors: ESG Challenges

Questions

Which indicators are mandatory under the SFDR regulation for Principal Adverse Impacts?

"Greenhouse gas emissions, carbon footprint, exposure to fossil fuels"

"Share of renewable energy, board diversity"

"Overall ESG score, carbon intensity"

"All of the above"

What is the minimum investment universe reduction threshold for an approach to be considered significantly engaging according to the AMF?

10%

20%

30%

40%

What is the minimum ESG coverage threshold required by the AMF for funds with a central sustainability claim investing in large-cap developed market equities?

>75%

>85%

>90%

>95%

What are the two possible approaches for applying the concept of selectivity?

Best-in-class approach and best-in-universe approach

Sector exclusion approach and geographic exclusion approach

Internal rating approach and external rating approach

ESG score approach and financial score approach

The ESG coverage rate required by the AMF is the same for all asset classes.

True

False

"Rating improvement" according to the AMF

Click to see answer

Norm-based exclusions alone are sufficient to qualify an approach as significantly engaging according to the AMF.

True

False

Categorize items by dragging them to the appropriate zones

Items to categorize:

Classification of products into Articles 6, 8, and 9

Minimum reduction threshold for selectivity (20%)

Required ESG coverage rate (90% or 75%)

Categories:

SFDR Regulation

AMF Doctrine