Knowledge Base
Differentiate ESG, SRI, impact investing, and other sustainable finance terms and explain their specific applications
Which French label distinguishes funds that apply a robust socially responsible investment methodology?
The SRI Label, created in 2016 by the Ministry of the Economy, identifies funds that rigorously integrate ESG criteria. Since the reform of March 1, 2024, it requires funds to invest at least 15% of their portfolio in high-impact sectors with transition plans aligned with the Paris Agreement.
What is the estimated global market size of impact investing in 2024?
According to the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN), the impact investing market reached $1,571 billion in 2024. This estimate reflects the significant growth of this type of investment that combines social/environmental impact with financial returns.
What are the three pillars of ESG criteria?
ESG criteria assess companies across three dimensions: Environmental (impact on ecosystems), Social (treatment of employees and stakeholders), and Governance (transparency and ethics). These pillars complement traditional financial analysis, as specified by the AMF.
Categorize items by dragging them to the appropriate zones
Items to categorize:
Exclusion
Best-in-class
Shareholder engagement
The GSIA taxonomy from the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance classifies strategies into several categories. Exclusion eliminates sectors, best-in-class selects the best companies by sector, and shareholder engagement influences practices through dialogue.
Solidarity-based finance always aims to maximize financial returns while supporting social causes.
Unlike SRI, solidarity-based finance does not necessarily seek to maximize financial returns. It finances projects such as employment access for disadvantaged individuals or social housing. In France, it represents 20.3 billion euros compared to more than 800 billion for SRI.
Impact investing is limited to investing in specific themes such as climate or water.
Impact investing goes beyond thematic investing. It requires three fundamental characteristics: intentionality (explicit identification of a cause), additionality (contribution that effectively increases the impact), and measurability (monitoring with specific indicators). A thematic water fund cannot always demonstrate these elements, unlike an impact investment.