Knowledge Base
Assess the effectiveness of existing reporting procedures and recommend improvements
Which reporting procedure evaluation method is specifically used by the AMF in France?
The AMF uses the SPOT (Supervision des Pratiques Opérationnelles et Thématiques) inspection as its reference method for evaluating reporting procedures. This inspection examines four areas: organisation and governance, procedural framework, operational implementation, and internal control activities. The AMF 2023 summary revealed significant gaps in permanent controls.
Which reporting evaluation criterion verifies that all required information is transmitted without omission?
Completeness is the first fundamental criterion identified by the AMF. It ensures that all required information is effectively transmitted to the competent authorities without omission. For example, for MiFIR reporting, this means all transactions must be reported in accordance with the 85 data fields required by EMIR Refit.
Which articles of the AMF General Regulation address reporting information obligations?
Articles 318-6 and 321-35 of the AMF General Regulation specifically address reporting information obligations. These articles define the requirements for transmitting information to competent authorities, a crucial aspect of evaluating the effectiveness of reporting procedures.
What is the average reconciliation rate of common economic data for transactions in Europe according to ESMA?
ESMA indicated that only 40% of transactions achieve a satisfactory level of reconciliation of common economic data. This rate reveals significant data quality issues in the European financial sector, requiring improvements in reporting procedures.
What are the four fundamental criteria for evaluating a reporting framework according to the AMF?
Click to see answer
The four criteria are: completeness (full transmission of information), accuracy (correspondence with reality), timeliness (compliance with deadlines), and traceability (ability to reconstruct the data trail). These criteria were identified during the 2023 and 2024 SPOT inspections.
The average matching rate between counterparties for EMIR reporting was 100% in 2022 according to ESMA.
ESMA indicated that the average matching rate between counterparties for EMIR reporting was 86% in 2022, revealing significant room for improvement. This rate is well below 100%, indicating data quality issues in the European financial sector.
An exemplary firm established three types of committees to improve reporting quality according to the AMF.
The AMF observed that an exemplary firm had established three types of committees enabling successive monitoring of data quality, risk management, and pre-submission validation of finalised reports. This approach demonstrates the importance of governance in improving reporting procedures.
Categorize items by dragging them to the appropriate zones
Items to categorize:
Automation
Strengthening controls
Training
Improving governance
Priority improvement areas include automation (adoption of ISO 20022 XML format), strengthening controls (first-level controls), training (on regulatory obligations), and improving governance (establishment of dedicated committees). These areas are identified by the AMF as essential for improving reporting quality.